The fascist dystopia that will be the post-IR Iran

The writing is on the wall: Over the next decade, especially after Ayatollah Khamenei dies, Iran will transition from an Islamic Republic to an authoritarian, uber-nationalist, rightwing semi-secular state that will revive Aryanism as state ideology and which will enshrine Arab-hatred as its foreign policy. This future Iran will align with Israel and Russia. Evidence for the coming naziesque Iranian dystopia is already present on the ground throughout the length and breadth of the country in the sentiments of both urban and rural populations as the brand of Islamism ushered in by Ayatollah Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution of 1979 finds itself more and more discredited in the eyes of the population. 

The neoliberal capitalist economic edifice for this post-IR Aryanist Iran is already in place. Sans oil, and given that Iran is mineral rich, this future Iranian society will even be allowed to become a major player in atomic energy and other alternatives to fossil fuels on the global market. 

As I have said in the past, I do not believe anymore that the Islamic Revolution of 1979 was an actual Revolution. Rather it appears that it was a coup d’etat engineered by competing elements to the Pahlavis and their cronies in the Iranian deep state of the time, together with those forces Kermit Roosevelt had originally organized in 1953 against Mossadegh, who used Khomeini and Islam to displace the Pahlavis. The replacement of the Islamic Republic will follow a similar trajectory as the fall of the Shah’s regime but I do not anticipate that it will follow the logic of the same form of violent upheaval that occurred in 1978-9.

Already in Iran there exist side by side to the official system of the Islamic Republic parallel societies of exorbitant wealth, privilege and opulence, many of which simultaneously have deep links to the system, but who scoff and ridicule the ideology of the IRI and the whole system itself: a system these people believe they are above. These are either former officials or their children who have come into financial power and influence independently of the system -- although they initially piggy-backed on the back of the system in order to get there. Representatives of these parallel societies already exhibit a very conspicuous ultra-nationalist ideology that features Aryanist ultra-nationalism, Arab-hatred and a deep abiding Islamophobia.

This state of affairs is dangerous for Iran (esp. its minorities), not to mention the rest of the region, and is one that should be resisted. However, I do not see how it can effectively be resisted anymore either. Cumulatively, events of the past few years – and esp. the past six months – have irreparably weakened the Islamic Republic of Iran and its remaining diehard elite with their multitude of sycophants. War, years of corruption and mismanagement, political repression, international sanctions and a faltering economy, the massive and ever-expanding chasm between haves and have nots, and, above all, the coronavirus has done the rest. Clearly, and whatever the spin put out by official sources, the sentiment of the majority of the Iranian population is no longer with its system.

While in 2009 I would have celebrated any anticipation of the imminent collapse of the Islamic Republic, today I do not for obvious reasons, because if the Islamic Republic is to go, I do not look at an authoritarian, Islamophobic Aryanist Iranian nation as the viable alternative to the Islamic Republic. Rather such a scenario that could possibly unfold is a descent into the grips of a false dialectic while opening Iran up to (other than the Anglo-European West) two of its real enemies: Zionism and Neo-Tsarism. A Mossadeghist democratic socialist model would be the real alternative but that is not where certain powers are going to take it.

Popular Posts