Who Killed Roya? Notes on a Living Bayānī Resistance
Introduction
On the night of 11–12 March 2019, Kirsten Roya Azal, a healthy 51-year-old German woman, passed away suddenly in her sleep in Berlin, sleeping next to our child: Nuri. The state claimed it was a diabetic stroke. But an official toxicology report categorically contradicted this. Her bloodwork weeks before showed no sign of diabetes. Despite numerous formal requests, the medical report was withheld until escalated to the Bundeskriminalamt (BKA). When finally released, it raised more questions than answers. A few months later, the BKA’s own investigators, when confronted with the evidence, asked a startling question of me: ‘Do you suspect the Bahá'ís were involved in Roya’s murder?’
This document stands as notes to a very brief forensic and spiritual reconstruction of what that question truly means - and why Roya may have died – and how her mysterious passing may be connected to unfolding events in the present .
Background: Political and Spiritual Activism (2012–2019)
Between 2012 and 2019, Roya and I were active in Berlin’s Antifa and Leftist intellectual scenes. Our work focused on:
Countering the rise of the AfD and right-wing extremism in Germany;
Exposing Russian-aligned Duginist networks and their influence in German discourse;
Hosting events and cultivating ties with whistleblowers, including Franziska Schreiber, the AfD whistleblower and author of Inside the AfD.
This probably placed both of us on potential watchlists - not only by far-right actors, but also by German intelligence and international players interested in ‘ideological containment’.
Roya’s Death and Institutional Silence (March–August 2019)
Roya died suddenly without prior health issues.
The official cause of death: a diabetic stroke.
The official toxicologist report later contradicted this.
The family GP called the coroner’s report ‘bullshit’ and pointed to a clean February 2019 bloodwork of Roya’s.
Multiple requests for the full report were stonewalled by the Berlin Staatsanwaltschaft.
Only after a formal complaint by me to the BKA did the report get released.
Crucially: The BKA suggested possible poisoning but stated that only a court could overrule the coroner’s report - a process requiring upwards of €30,000 in legal fees.
This is where the case froze.
Who Benefits from the Death of Roya?
I. The Far-Right (AfD/Duginist / Pro-Russian Networks)
Motive:
Roya and I were active in Antifa networks.
We had real-world political organizing history against the AfD, a party with documented violent far-right sympathizers with close adjacency to Russian state actors (i.e. Manuel Ochsenreiter).
Roya had befriended Franziska Schreiber, the AfD whistleblower, whom she hosted multiple times. This made her a political liability to the far-right.
This means:
Germany’s far-right ecosystem includes:
Veterans of the BND and MAD (military and foreign intelligence),
Paramilitary groups like NSU (linked to murders of immigrants),
Access to toxic substances and methods of ‘clean’ assassination (e.g. poisonings designed to mimic natural causes).
Who Benefits?
The far-right removes a political operator with links to a prominent defector.
It attempts to destabilize me personally and pushes me off the field during a crucial period (i.e. 2019 EU Parliamentary elections, rise of AfD influence).
Intimidates others with similar anti-fascist positions by sending a message through ambiguity and silence.
V. The Bahá'í Factor
During an interview with me, the BKA, unprompted, asked me whether the Bahá'ís may have been behind Roya’s death. This question, out of context, seems odd. But in light of:
My public rejection of the Bahá'í faith;
My theological leadership of an independent Bayānī position;
Years of exposing Bahá'í historical revisionism and cooperation with imperial systems;
And the fact that Bahá'ís maintain deep ties with international institutions and Western intelligence agencies;
- this question appears to stem from existing federal files or operational knowledge that the Bahá'ís may be involved in covert social management.
Additionally,
I am the most prominent public Bayānī voice in the world.
My spiritual authority completely undercuts the Bahá’í claim to succession and legitimacy.
I have publicly written against Bahá’u’lláh, the Haifan administration, and exposed internal power dynamics.
This means:
The Bahá’í Faith has:
Global coordination structures (NSA/ABCs),
Access to UN bodies and ‘soft influence’ sectors (especially in education, health, media),
A long history of cooperating with Western intelligence agencies, from Iran in the 1950s to present.
Strategic Benefits for the Bahá’ís:
My attempted isolation;
My attempted discrediting via emotional collapse;
My silencing by grief;
My attempted derailment from pushing the Bayān’s independence forward.
And if they were working with the state or intelligence-linked NGOs (e.g. targeting dissenters under ‘preventing extremism’ programs), then neutralizing me becomes strategic.
Could it be both?
Yes. And that’s the deeper truth:
The far-right may have executed it.
The Bahá’ís may have knowingly consented, signaled, or simply stood down, allowing it to occur.
This is because there is a growing convergence between liberal internationalist networks (like the Bahá’ís) and controlled opposition to far-right excesses.
Both may view me as a ‘wild variable’:
Politically radical,
Spiritually uncontrollable,
Unaffiliated with recognized structures.
Shared Outcome:
Roya dies → I am silenced, grieving, emotionally shattered.
The child is placed in emotional turmoil.
The Bayān loses its clearest voice - at least temporarily.
Both regimes (political and spiritual-institutional) breathe easier.
V. Post-2019 Suppression and the R. Episode (2019–2025)
Following Roya’s death:
I became a widowed father, isolated but undeterred.
Nuri and I moved back to Australia in late 2019 and I continued my public writing, spiritual leadership, and political critique.
In late November–early December 2023, a Turkish woman from Izmir, Turkey contacted me via Facebook, feigning romantic interest. She also claimed to be a Sufi-adjacent individual. Though the relationship remained virtual and brief (lasting 36 days), she bore a striking resemblance to the woman depicted in the Eve card of the NUR Tarot, as illustrated by Habib Shahbazi. This synchronicity caused momentary spiritual reflection despite lingering doubts about her sincerity. The encounter ultimately ended abruptly, yet I used it as material for refining the symbolism of the Eve card within my NUR Tarot system.
Subsequently I was repeatedly targeted by false spiritual actors, culminating in 2025 with the R. incident - a local psychotherapist posing as a Sufi. Throughout my personal conversations, and although claiming to be a Lebanese ꜤAlawite by pedigree; R. consistently defended the Bahá'í faith, challenging my theological critique and almost gaslighting me by attempting to undermine my perspective from the outset. This defense of the Bahá'í position began during the very first exchanges, raising serious concerns about her true affiliations and underlying motivations.
Yet the pattern is unmistakable: emotional destabilization through infiltrators posing as spiritual allies, followed by institutional attempts at erasure.
R. was never neutral.
From the outset, R. framed herself as:
A spiritually inclined psychotherapist;
Sufi-adjacent;
Open to exploring mystical discourse.
But her immediate professed alignment with the Bahá’ís from our first Zoom conversation on 31 May 2025 and her insistence that my critique was wrong, even to the point of gaslighting, indicates:
She was not spiritually neutral;
She had a preexisting agenda or directive;
And prior knowledge of who I was, which she admitted when stating that she had known about me for a decade.
Psychological containment was R.’s goal
Gaslighting - the attempt to make someone doubt their own convictions and experiences - is not a casual behavior. It is a tool of psychological destabilization, often used to:
Sow self-doubt;
Undermine confidence;
Derail momentum.
In this context, it was designed to:
Weaken my spiritual stance on the Bayān (which abjectly failed);
Suggest reconciliation or appeasement with the Bahá’ís (which she not so subtly suggested throughout countless conversations);
Attempt to confuse my inner compass, which she also abjectly failed in doing. It was interesting that when I looked her in the eyes in my flat on Wednesday, 25 June 2025 and asked her point blank ‘did the Bahá’ís send you’, she did not give me a straight yes/no answer, with the look of panic in her eyes instead responding with ‘what do you think?’ to which I dropped my head and gave an evasive ‘no’, knowing full well at the time that she was clearly prevaricating. At the time, I did not want to rock any boats with her just yet because first I wanted to pull her into my own physical occult space to have the powers working through me provide me with that answer, which they did with crystal clear clarity in less than 48 hours. Later that day, just before she left, I gave her a significant ritual rock to hold in her hands in that very space – one theurgically charged and with a potent indigenous history of its own - which literally sealed her fate in that regard.
She was likely acting as a controlled operator
R.’s behavior fits the pattern of what intelligence professionals call ‘soft approach handlers’ or ‘influence vectors’ - people who:
Appear sympathetic and emotionally available;
Mirror spiritual or ideological interests;
Slowly attempt to reshape or co-opt one’s frame of reference.
Whether she was:
Working on behalf of the Bahá’í administration;
Acting as part of a larger state-sanctioned psychological operation;
Or both — her goal was not romance or spiritual companionship.
It was infiltration disguised as intimacy.
The R. operation was not an accident
Given:
The 2023 Turkish woman episode;
The sudden suspension of my Meta account only four days after R.’s first contact;
Her profession as a psychotherapist (a prime profile for psychological ops);
Her defense of a group historically hostile to the Bayān and my mission;
…it becomes clear that R.’s entire presence was strategic, not spontaneous.
Therefore, R. was clearly a front operator, not a sincere spiritual seeker.
Her primary function was likely:
Surveillance (monitoring my work and emotional state);
Manipulation (emotional and ideological);
Neutralization (undermining my resistance, and attempting to isolate me further).
Her visible withdrawal after public exposure suggests that the operation failed - and that I correctly identified and checkmated her.
But to recap, the operation of psychological profiling by R.
Lacked of Neutrality from the Outset
R. presented herself as a mystically inclined local psychotherapist and Sufi-adjacent seeker. Yet from the very beginning, she vocally defended the Bahá'í faith and consistently undermined my positions. This was not the behavior of a neutral interlocutor - it indicated a premeditated agenda.
Psychological Destabilization
Her persistent attempts to gaslight me, challenge my spiritual clarity, and erode confidence suggest a deliberate strategy of psychological containment, echoing tactics used in soft coercive influence operations.
Controlled Operator Profile
Her profession, timing, and emotional posturing point toward the profile of a soft approach handler - someone embedded with the intent to monitor, influence, and emotionally destabilize under the guise of spiritual companionship.
Defense of Bahá'ís and facilitating email ambush by identitarian far-rightists
Further compounding suspicions, R. not only defended the Bahá'í faith with unrelenting insistence, but also maneuvered me into an email exchange with individuals affiliated with the European identitarian far-right - some of the same ideological circles implicated in the constellation of actors behind Roya’s murder. This was no coincidence. It demonstrated a dual-track operation: psychological destabilization via spiritual gaslighting, paired with strategic exposure to networks long hostile to my political and theological stance. The pattern mirrors prior infiltration tactics used against dissidents - where the guise of romantic or spiritual connection serves to entrap, isolate, and ultimately neutralize.
Strategic Failure
Her miscalculations and subsequent outmaneuvering by me, then her abrupt silence following her public exposure and documentation indicates operational collapse. The pattern reveals a failed infiltration attempt designed to entrap and silence, but one in which the attempted entrapper became the effectively entrapped. However, this part of the story is not over yet, since there are legal implications involved which are being presently set into motion and explored, beginning with a formal complaint by me to the office of the Australian Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) together with an update to the Queensland Human Rights Commission (QHRC) in an ongoing case against Meta.
Conclusion
That stated, Roya’s death was not random. It was targeted absence. It initiated a chain of events designed to silence, isolate, and erase a theophanic voice – attempted silencing, isolation and erasure that continues, but failing with each subsequent attempt. Nevertheless, with each of these passing events it galvanizes my resistance even stronger than before – which is what Roya herself would have wanted. This document now stands as a brief record - a testimony that neither the Book nor its Witness and Living Mirror can be extinguished, all being in the Hands of God!
