CESNUR officially attacks me! Yeah!!!
See also as PDF, here and here.
On 21 August 2025, Bitter Winter — the media outlet of CESNUR (the Center for Studies on New Religions, a formal international cult lobby)—published a defamatory article targeting me by name, authored by Rosita Šorytė. This was not scholarship, nor even fair commentary. It was a calculated smear, designed to criminalize, exoticize, and delegitimize. Rosita Šorytė (b. 1965, Lithuania) is a former Lithuanian diplomat and is closely associated with CESNUR’s defense of NRMS as one of their paid professional lobbyists.
The Smear Tactics
Šorytė’s article recycles familiar CESNUR techniques:
- Imputing criminality: claiming my correspondence has been “reported to police” and portraying rhetorical flourishes (“I am the Spider itself…”) as literal threats. This tactic of equating critique with violence has been used repeatedly by CESNUR writers against anti-cult scholars and survivors of abuse.
- Pathologizing spirituality: dismissing mystical visions as “hallucinations,” while sensationalizing plant-based traditions long rooted in Islamic esotericism (e.g., use of Peganum harmala).
- Delegitimizing identity: reducing the Order Sufi Fāṭimiyya to “New Age syncreticism with unknown membership,” despite extensive documentation of its theological basis in my published works since 2005.
- Smear by association: invoking figures such as Aleister Crowley and Julius Evola as if admiration for aspects of their esotericism renders my own arguments invalid.
- Silencing critique: refusing to address the substance of my work — my dismantling of AROPL’s reincarnation doctrine , my critique of Bahá’í imperial structures, and my exposure of CESNUR’s own entanglements with cultic networks.
This is reputational warfare, not scholarship—and her tone proves it.
Why Now?
The timing of CESNUR’s escalation is revealing. It coincides with three developments:
1. The Ronia Incident – a failed psychological entrapment designed to destabilize me emotionally and spiritually, documented in June–July 2025 and reported to authorities.
2. The M–M Zionist Nexus – the ideological grooming of the mother by SM, linked to Bahá’í and Chabad channels with clear geopolitical overtones (and known indirect connections to CESNUR).
3. My Exposure Campaign – formal complaints lodged with Australian authorities (including IGIS and the QHRC), public dossiers, and ongoing publications mapping how cults are weaponized for influence.
This article is not isolated. It functions as the international extension of a local operation: while the M. nexus seeks to fracture family ties and entrapment vectors like Ronia attempt to discredit me, CESNUR provides the global narrative cover — branding me as violent, delusional, or conspiracist. Except they just made a massive blunder by giving me and my two publications a limelight.
The Larger Pattern
What we are witnessing is textbook perception management:
- Local disruption (family manipulation, social pressure).
- Personal destabilization (psychological entrapments).
- International narrative control (Bitter Winter’s smear).
This triad is a familiar pattern in psychological operations: break the individual, fracture their support, then delegitimize them globally so their testimony cannot be trusted.
What This Proves
It proves that my critiques have landed where CESNUR is most vulnerable. For the world’s foremost cult-apologist organization to target me by name demonstrates that my arguments can no longer be ignored.
Instead of rebutting The Goal of the Unwise on its merits — such as my theological dismantling of reincarnation, which I showed to be metaphysically incoherent and politically dangerous — CESNUR resorts to exoticism, innuendo, and false allegations. Smears are the last refuge of those who have no answers.
My Response
- I reject categorically the defamatory claims made by Rosita Šorytė in Bitter Winter and reserve the right to take action against her in law.
- I reserve all legal rights under Australian defamation law.
- I reaffirm my commitment to exposing the nexus of cult apologia, ideological capture, and covert influence networks that CESNUR exemplifies.
Conclusion
This is not only about me. It is about how entrenched structures of power — religious, political, and intelligence-adjacent — deploy smear campaigns to neutralize those who unmask their involvement with cults. CESNUR is a corporate lobby organization, and I have exposed its precise role in the GOAL OF THE UNWISE. That they react the way they do proves all of my allegations against them.
If I were irrelevant, CESNUR would ignore me. That they attack me so directly is proof of the opposite: we are winning—because what Rosita Šorytė writes does not deter me; it emboldens me and now places me as an official global opposition figure against CESNUR and its entire cultic apparatus network from the north to the south pole. Bitter winter indeed! But I am the scorching summer. That, Massimo, was a blunder you will bitterly regret.
